Legendary Janice Fiamengo and Paul Elam piercing through the cracks of our gynocentric society 👏👏
I enjoyed the historical account of the higher education institutions that were open to women even before the declaration of sentiments, and the idea of women finally adulting a bit.
First off - pls parse this vid then sell it to pearl as a response / comment series -
You both deserve to get paid 5 figures for each snippet - and vastly more for putting "the correction" in motion
Second - Janice just distilled feminist social conditioning and the current manifestation of Canada" so succinctly there may be physical density associated
Again - monetize it pls
Finally - as a former Canadian myself - it was both vindicating and a bit sad to hear for the first time another Canadian articulating the inferiority complex that both plagued the Canadian "culture" and my childhood and early life.
Without the violins it's comforting to finally hear a baseline for all that persecution.
Living now as an American (citizen) it is a sad state to observe a toxically feminized homeland being lead by the nose in such an obvious and blatantly manipulative manner - this may be the pinnacle definition of irony
Lastly - what is misogyny ? Again it was vindicating to here a scholar in the subject of female nature elucidate that ( to paraphrase ) "women do not care about the greater good, or children or the family unit" which - based on all data - I had concluded as well.
My struggle is this combined with the on going con of victimhood / the consciously fabricated smoke screen of oppression / and the evil tactics to enforce both narratives such as family court and false allegations - --- how is one to perceive women as a whole give the consistent and conscious choices they are making to maintain the above ?
Two of my favorite people !! Thank you both for all that you do, say, and write to spread the common sense. You have both helped to keep me sane in this crazy world for a good ten years now. I feel blessed to have found you and hope to one day financially contribute once circumstances will allow it. 🙏🏻🙏🏻❤️❤️
Paul, toward the end, you ask for Janice's "magic wand" solution. I have one, first suggested by the great Daniel Amneus, the first real scholar to address these matters: father custody in divorce. Mother custody (codified in "no-fault" divorce) was the feminists' greatest victory. Taking it back would cut the Gordian Knot and break the back of not only the custody machinery but feminism generally. I am increasingly convinced he was right. The dynamics and logic driving feminist power point to it unmistakably. You may not agree, but it would be worth a full debate.
Children are through the seed of man. Children belong to the men. You don’t hear custody debates in the Bible because only the man was able to initiate the divorce and he put his wife out with nothing. No children, no money, no dowry, nothing but the cloths on her back. He “sends her away” because everything after a marriage belongs to the man. Jesus was the seed of Abraham. When you had a child outside the marriage, the child belonged with the mother and stayed with the mother. After marriage, a child belongs to the biological father. That is why you don’t have step fathers in the Bible fighting over custody after a divorce. Your correct. Giving women the power to divorce and the standard of custody after the divorces goes against thousands of years of custody strategies and practices.
This was brilliant. Lots of things to refer back to. “Votes or boats”.. I hadn’t heard of that reference before. I understood the concepts about the losses but hadn’t heard that phrase.
"One of the BS things interviewers gotta ask" 😂
What a great talk!
Legendary Janice Fiamengo and Paul Elam piercing through the cracks of our gynocentric society 👏👏
I enjoyed the historical account of the higher education institutions that were open to women even before the declaration of sentiments, and the idea of women finally adulting a bit.
Thank you, Janice and Paul, for the excellent discussion.
First off - pls parse this vid then sell it to pearl as a response / comment series -
You both deserve to get paid 5 figures for each snippet - and vastly more for putting "the correction" in motion
Second - Janice just distilled feminist social conditioning and the current manifestation of Canada" so succinctly there may be physical density associated
Again - monetize it pls
Finally - as a former Canadian myself - it was both vindicating and a bit sad to hear for the first time another Canadian articulating the inferiority complex that both plagued the Canadian "culture" and my childhood and early life.
Without the violins it's comforting to finally hear a baseline for all that persecution.
Living now as an American (citizen) it is a sad state to observe a toxically feminized homeland being lead by the nose in such an obvious and blatantly manipulative manner - this may be the pinnacle definition of irony
Lastly - what is misogyny ? Again it was vindicating to here a scholar in the subject of female nature elucidate that ( to paraphrase ) "women do not care about the greater good, or children or the family unit" which - based on all data - I had concluded as well.
My struggle is this combined with the on going con of victimhood / the consciously fabricated smoke screen of oppression / and the evil tactics to enforce both narratives such as family court and false allegations - --- how is one to perceive women as a whole give the consistent and conscious choices they are making to maintain the above ?
Excellent, thanks as always!!!
I particularly enjoyed the section after 1:06:49, when Paul says:
“Let me put you a little bit on the spot here. Did we make a mistake in giving women political power?”
JUSTICE FOR MEN & BOYS http://j4mb.org.uk
CAMPAIGN FOR MERIT IN BUSINESS http://c4mb.uk
LAUGHING AT FEMINISTS http://laughingatfeminists.com
Two of my favorite people !! Thank you both for all that you do, say, and write to spread the common sense. You have both helped to keep me sane in this crazy world for a good ten years now. I feel blessed to have found you and hope to one day financially contribute once circumstances will allow it. 🙏🏻🙏🏻❤️❤️
Thank you for your impact on my life and the lives of countless others.
Paul, toward the end, you ask for Janice's "magic wand" solution. I have one, first suggested by the great Daniel Amneus, the first real scholar to address these matters: father custody in divorce. Mother custody (codified in "no-fault" divorce) was the feminists' greatest victory. Taking it back would cut the Gordian Knot and break the back of not only the custody machinery but feminism generally. I am increasingly convinced he was right. The dynamics and logic driving feminist power point to it unmistakably. You may not agree, but it would be worth a full debate.
Children are through the seed of man. Children belong to the men. You don’t hear custody debates in the Bible because only the man was able to initiate the divorce and he put his wife out with nothing. No children, no money, no dowry, nothing but the cloths on her back. He “sends her away” because everything after a marriage belongs to the man. Jesus was the seed of Abraham. When you had a child outside the marriage, the child belonged with the mother and stayed with the mother. After marriage, a child belongs to the biological father. That is why you don’t have step fathers in the Bible fighting over custody after a divorce. Your correct. Giving women the power to divorce and the standard of custody after the divorces goes against thousands of years of custody strategies and practices.
This is reflected in the Common Law, Napleonic Code, and no doubt other legal systems. Thomas Hobbes says something similar.
It's not that men hate women. It's rather #femimistfatigue
This was brilliant. Lots of things to refer back to. “Votes or boats”.. I hadn’t heard of that reference before. I understood the concepts about the losses but hadn’t heard that phrase.