Another enlightening albeit disturbing-at-its-core discussion held by master conversationalist, this time with Arvis Owens, a target of false sexual allegations in the military.
As the father of a son currently in the Air Force, tales from his Air Force Academy experiences and subsequent experiences as a pilot trainer have been more than enough to convince me that the military has allowed itself to be an organization that lets women paint targets on the backs of innocent men.
However, this directly mirrors our civilian culture, and I'm convinced no amount of splintered activism will ever solve this problem. At the risk of being boringly redundant, my assertion is that we will consistently see the ebbing and flowing of men being kept at heel by women through false allegations until men collectively rise up and demand the following:
a. The end of the family court system.
b. The end of child support payments.
c. The end of all welfare programs (leave such things to churches and other non-governmental charity organizations).
d. The end of no-fault divorce.
e. Custody automatically granted to fathers when divorce occurs, with custody granted to women only when both parents agree to it.
f. Commensurate punishments for women who are proven to have made false sexual-behavior allegations.
All reasonable sociological research supports all of the above.
In the absence of all of the above, mainstream Western culture will just continue to walk around with its thumb up its ass, continuing to wonder why women are having such a hard time finding men who are willing to hand women loaded guns, er, I mean, to marry them.
Connected to this is the issue of military men involuntarily divorced and required to pay exhorbitant child support (often on reduced reservist pay) while they are on active duty defending their country, but unable to defend themselves in court and arrested as soon as they return home. (For which, see https://www.stephenbaskerville.com/taken-into-custody, chapter 3.) Together with the false accusations, is it any wonder that the military cannot recruit qualified men?
If there are any who haven't read the afore-mentioned book, you really should. For those who haven't been experienced this heinous process, gobsmacked is the usual reaction.
I live in a state of constant disbelief with regard to the blatant evil of feminists. It is breathtaking. It is evil. It is sadistic. Women make men look like Bambi when they have a feminist leaning. I've seen this up close in family break ups, women you believed were decent, caring people reveal their true colors, the moment money or control of children or a house is involved.
When it comes to false allegations, the suggestion that 2% of allegations might be false is farcical joke. I'd say 50% would be closer to the truth. Why wouldn't this be the case when women have so much power in cases of rape and nothing to lose. They can destroy a man they hate, gain financially and wallow in the delicious role of victim. What's not to like about it?
Arvis- I am so sorry you have endured this hell. You are a tremendous advocate for men- very smart and articulate.
This is what you get when you are dealing with the evil RADICAL FEMINISTS running the Family Courts. Radical Feminism is an offshoot of Communism. The founder, Betty Friedan, of the evil cabal of demons known as the National Organization of Women (N.O.W.) was a card-carrying Communist in the 1960s and 1970s, during Communisms heyday and when they were threatening the United States and other free nations around the world. Friedan was a down-an-out ugly women, who wrote a couple of books on feminism that catapulted her into stardom of the Feminist movement in the 1960s and 1970s. She was so ugly that she reminded me of a dog that chases parked cars. She was a self-loathing woman who turned her stardom against men. And, the Radical Anti-Men Movement was started. Because of Radfem pressure and their ability to obtain federal and state funding based on their screeching against male politicians as sexist or racists, Family courts have now morphed into the Soviet and Nazi-style courts of the past, where men have no constitutional rights, and you are guilty the moment you enter the courtroom because you stand to go to the bathroom.
Sorry to say but right wing 'Christian' w0e-MEN are IMOP even MORE EVIL than the lefties. They only care about fe-MALE entitlement and privilege. Have you read anything from that trad/CON/Christian/feminist fraud Lilia Rose? If you scroll down her page, it will read like this: Ex porn hub/only fans hoes are victims...
Prostitutes are victims...
w0e-MEN who have abortions are being coerced into it by the abortion clinics...
woe-MEN who murder children are suffering from post-partum psychosis...
w0e-MEN who murder children are not getting enough child support...
The mother & child bond is the most sacred thing...
Men are obsessed with their authority role in the family...
For anyone who doesn't already know: Lilia Rose is a trad/feminist/ FAKE Christian
In New Jersey and New York, false allegations of domestic violence reaches the 75% level. And, many false allegations are repeat offenders. Accorindg to NJ State Police Crime Reports, and NY State court reports, the largest number of "allegations" of domestic violence are harassment. They make up 80% of all domestic violence allegations because harassment is a vague statute, and anything can be made up to constitute harassment.
However, with that being said, the New Jersey Supreme Court made an unbelievable ruling in State v. Burkert, 231 N.J. 257 (2017). The State Supreme Court held that the trial judge erred by failing to apply enumerated constitutional principles in alleged harassing conduct raised by Defendant Mother. In that case, the New Jersey Supreme Court held that N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4(a), only encompasses modes of communicative harassment that are (1) “invasive of the reicipient’s privacy” or (2) “constitutes threats to safety”. State v. Burkert, 231 N.J. 257, 281 (2017).
Given that the communications between Plaintiff and Defendant are solely about the children, custody/parenting time, and the children’s school activities and grades, Defendant has abused the domestic violence laws in a strategy and tactics to interfere with Plaintiff’s parental rights through an ongoing campaign of false allegations to perpetrate parental alienation. Since Defendant willfully refuses to cooperate with Plaintiff Father, it causes Plaintiff to become frustrated where he attempts to contact Defendant to allow him access to the children.
Plaintiff’s frustration can lead to harsh and crude terms, as happened in this instant case. A parent has the right to be frustrated with another parent when their parenting time/custody is being obstructed or interfered with. Defendant uses this frustration to create false allegations of domestic violence at any chance she can get. It is not an invasion of privacy as Defendant would like the Court to believe. She is the antagonist. There is no categorical ‘harassment exception’ to the First Amendment’s free speech clause. Saxe v. State Coll. Area Sch. Dist., 240 F.3d 200, 204 (3d Cir. 2001)(Alito, J.). Speech “cannot be transformed into criminal conduct merely because it annoys, disturbs, or arouses contempt.” State v. Burkert, 231 N.J. 257, 281 (2017).
Even Plaintiff’s alleged harassing written communications, in the forms of texts or e-mails, “fall within the category of protected speech”. Virgin Islands v. Vanterpool, 767 F.3d 157, 160, 167 (3d Cir. 2014). Criminal harassment conviction was overturned because “expressions remain protected even where content hurts feelings, causes offense, or evokes resentment”. State v. Burkert, 444 N.J. Super. 591, 601 (App. Div. 2016), aff’d 231 N.J. 257 (2017).
Then, in New Jersey, you have the false allegations of child abuse as the second component of the campaign of parental alienation. In the New Jersey Supreme Court precedential case of S.C. v. New Jersey Department of Children and Families, 242 N.J. 201 (2020) it was held that a family court judge has to provide an evidentiary hearing on a "NOT ESTABLISHED" finding by the N.J. Department of Children and Families. The Supreme Court noted that when the confidential information is released to a court in a family law proceeding, that such a process provided the parent “adequate opportunity to be heard on the threshold issue of admissibility and thereafter to cross-examine and offer contrary proofs.”
It established that finding of “NOT ESTABLISHED” cannot be expunged, and could later harm the accused in employment, seeking employment, or personal reputation. It can also be used if other later cases arise. This is of interest to family law practitioners, since the process the court describes is a rare one – usually the records are released to the judge for in camera review and then the court releases the records in its discretion to the parties without any kind of threshold argument as to admissibility or an opportunity to cross-examine. Plaintiff claims (1) he suffered and continues to suffer a deprivation of his due process rights because he was not afforded a hearing on the “not established” finding, and (2) that the Department's "not established" finding was arbitrary and capricious because the record was insufficient to support a finding that his children, specifically his son, were harmed.
The Supreme Court held that with respect to the Department’s standard for making a finding of “not established” as currently written in the N.J. child abuse statutes, N.J.S.A. 9:6-8.21 and N.J.A.C. 3A:10-7.3 (c) and (d), is vague, amorphous, and incapable of any objective calibration. All that is known is that it requires less than a preponderance of the evidence standard and involves “some” evidence. The High Court held that “some” evidence must be understood to be “credible evidence”. Defendant must have the right to be heard and respond, and be given a written statement of reasons in any decision involving “NOT ESTABLISHED”. S.C. v. N.J. Dep’t of Children & Families, 242 N.J. 201, at 387–88, 394–95. See also Department of Children and Families v. B.C., (N.J. App. Div., Docket No. A-2312-20, decided November 2, 2022 (unpublished), at *8, *17),
LOL NO! >97% of rape 'claims' are LIES... the 2% are the real rapes! The mainstream uses the truth in reverse! By Saul Alinsky's playbook rules for radicals/ "Use the truth in reverse" The 2% are the real rapes >97% are LIES! 60% in the military alone by the accuser's own admission.
Your discussion after 36:00 about the larger corruption of prosecutors and the judiciary is important and a potential entry to gain a larger audience for all this. (The plea bargain system that Mr Owens mentions is, just by itself, increasingly recognized as a system of extortion.) The Trump Administration has been silent about judicial reform, despite the lawfare operations against Trump himself and his officials and despite the judiciary now trying to thwart his reforms. (His first administration was also silent.) We need to call attention to this omission by Trump. Some literature on judicial corruption in America, is cited in all my book, most recently in Who Lost America?, chapter 3 (https://www.stephenbaskerville.com/copy-2-of-why-did-it-happen).
BINGO! Trump is a male feminist I'm sorry to say. The 1rst time I voted for Trump is because he called Megan Kelly out for being on the rag. The 2nd time I voted for Trump is because he called Megan Kelly out for being on the rag. The 3rd time I voted for Trump is because he called Megan Kelly out for being on the rag. I'm not voting for him the next time LOL
God bless Arvis Owens! Another class act and stellar guest. Long overdue! SPOILER ALERT:
From an Airforce study and the subject of a 1990's documentary (discovery channel or TLC) ... Sam Donaldson was told by a military official that >60% of rape 'claims' in the military are LIES based only on the accuser's own admission! This study only counted an accusation as false if the accuser admitted she lied! This doesn't count false accusations that weren't admitted to. Consider that military w0e-MEN are between 14% to 16% of the military. 60% of military w0e-MEN'S rape 'claims' are LIES... by their own admission! So... what does the math say? 60% of rape claims are LIES by a 14 to 16% minority do the math. I'm not good at math but if 60% of rape claims are FALSE and they're emanating from a 14% to 16% minority of w0e-MEN making these claims...would I be right to assume 60% of military w0e-MEN LIE about rape? Victoria Toensing said to Sam Donaldson: "That doesn't sound right" "I don't believe that" "There's something wrong with the study" If I remember I think they cucked to her! Also...
International defense lawyer John Davis shows a graph where he proves that >97% of rape claims are LIES. The 2% are the real rapes. The mainstream Stats. are based on the inversion of the truth as in Saul Alinsky's 'RULES FOR RADICALS' Rule 101: 'use the truth in reverse' Please check my notes for this graph.
Like most of the mainstream propaganda in a Matriarchal society you can see a pattern of reverse logic and the inversion of the true facts the reverse of which become the Google checks and fact checks which are exactly opposite of the true numbers. Right out of Saul Alinksy's rules for radicals. If you look at the John Davis graph you will see that the mainstream stats. are the inverse of the truth! The 2% are the real rapes. The 97% are lies.
btw, NO PUSSY PASS for prosecutors & military officials who say: "we didn't want to do this" Being more afraid for your career than your fellow MAN... I say No excuse.
Keith: Your list to eliminate the FALSE ALLEGATIONS INDUSTRY and family courts, should start with the elimination of NO-FAULT DIVORCE. Eliminating NO-FAULT divorce will end the "gravy train grift" for lawyers and other hangers-on. Ever since No-Fault divorce came into being, the family has been devastated by special interest groups looking to make obscene amounts of money. Lawyers, mental health experts, child custody experts, child support caseworkers, etc., are profiting off of a racketeering scam where they use bribery, extortion, coercion, forced labor (violating 18 USC §1589), unconstitutional imprisonment for debt in civil matters, unconstitutional arrests in family court civil matters without 4th Amendment probable cause; probable cause can only exist in criminal matters; can never exist in civil matters).
Simultaneously family courts and their "hangers on" obtain obscene amounts of Federal funding (BILLIONS OF DOLLARS OF TAXPAYERS' MONIES BEING WASTED!!!!) for child support enforcement (Title IV-D business and racketeering scam, 42 USC §§651-669, specifically §658a [called the "Federal Child Support Enforcement Incentive to the States"], and §658f (allowing federal funding to go to the states with no strings attached; where states use the money to balance state employee pensions which includes judges, law enforcement, politicians, child support employees, etc.), Title IV-E foster care (stealing children under false allegations of child abuse/child sex abuse), and Title IV-A through C for the rest of it. Title IV is part of the Social Security Administrative System under 42 U.S.C. §402 et al.
Another enlightening albeit disturbing-at-its-core discussion held by master conversationalist, this time with Arvis Owens, a target of false sexual allegations in the military.
As the father of a son currently in the Air Force, tales from his Air Force Academy experiences and subsequent experiences as a pilot trainer have been more than enough to convince me that the military has allowed itself to be an organization that lets women paint targets on the backs of innocent men.
However, this directly mirrors our civilian culture, and I'm convinced no amount of splintered activism will ever solve this problem. At the risk of being boringly redundant, my assertion is that we will consistently see the ebbing and flowing of men being kept at heel by women through false allegations until men collectively rise up and demand the following:
a. The end of the family court system.
b. The end of child support payments.
c. The end of all welfare programs (leave such things to churches and other non-governmental charity organizations).
d. The end of no-fault divorce.
e. Custody automatically granted to fathers when divorce occurs, with custody granted to women only when both parents agree to it.
f. Commensurate punishments for women who are proven to have made false sexual-behavior allegations.
All reasonable sociological research supports all of the above.
In the absence of all of the above, mainstream Western culture will just continue to walk around with its thumb up its ass, continuing to wonder why women are having such a hard time finding men who are willing to hand women loaded guns, er, I mean, to marry them.
Connected to this is the issue of military men involuntarily divorced and required to pay exhorbitant child support (often on reduced reservist pay) while they are on active duty defending their country, but unable to defend themselves in court and arrested as soon as they return home. (For which, see https://www.stephenbaskerville.com/taken-into-custody, chapter 3.) Together with the false accusations, is it any wonder that the military cannot recruit qualified men?
If there are any who haven't read the afore-mentioned book, you really should. For those who haven't been experienced this heinous process, gobsmacked is the usual reaction.
I live in a state of constant disbelief with regard to the blatant evil of feminists. It is breathtaking. It is evil. It is sadistic. Women make men look like Bambi when they have a feminist leaning. I've seen this up close in family break ups, women you believed were decent, caring people reveal their true colors, the moment money or control of children or a house is involved.
When it comes to false allegations, the suggestion that 2% of allegations might be false is farcical joke. I'd say 50% would be closer to the truth. Why wouldn't this be the case when women have so much power in cases of rape and nothing to lose. They can destroy a man they hate, gain financially and wallow in the delicious role of victim. What's not to like about it?
Arvis- I am so sorry you have endured this hell. You are a tremendous advocate for men- very smart and articulate.
Keep up the fight Paul Elam. You are a legend.
This is what you get when you are dealing with the evil RADICAL FEMINISTS running the Family Courts. Radical Feminism is an offshoot of Communism. The founder, Betty Friedan, of the evil cabal of demons known as the National Organization of Women (N.O.W.) was a card-carrying Communist in the 1960s and 1970s, during Communisms heyday and when they were threatening the United States and other free nations around the world. Friedan was a down-an-out ugly women, who wrote a couple of books on feminism that catapulted her into stardom of the Feminist movement in the 1960s and 1970s. She was so ugly that she reminded me of a dog that chases parked cars. She was a self-loathing woman who turned her stardom against men. And, the Radical Anti-Men Movement was started. Because of Radfem pressure and their ability to obtain federal and state funding based on their screeching against male politicians as sexist or racists, Family courts have now morphed into the Soviet and Nazi-style courts of the past, where men have no constitutional rights, and you are guilty the moment you enter the courtroom because you stand to go to the bathroom.
Sorry to say but right wing 'Christian' w0e-MEN are IMOP even MORE EVIL than the lefties. They only care about fe-MALE entitlement and privilege. Have you read anything from that trad/CON/Christian/feminist fraud Lilia Rose? If you scroll down her page, it will read like this: Ex porn hub/only fans hoes are victims...
Prostitutes are victims...
w0e-MEN who have abortions are being coerced into it by the abortion clinics...
woe-MEN who murder children are suffering from post-partum psychosis...
w0e-MEN who murder children are not getting enough child support...
The mother & child bond is the most sacred thing...
Men are obsessed with their authority role in the family...
For anyone who doesn't already know: Lilia Rose is a trad/feminist/ FAKE Christian
In New Jersey and New York, false allegations of domestic violence reaches the 75% level. And, many false allegations are repeat offenders. Accorindg to NJ State Police Crime Reports, and NY State court reports, the largest number of "allegations" of domestic violence are harassment. They make up 80% of all domestic violence allegations because harassment is a vague statute, and anything can be made up to constitute harassment.
However, with that being said, the New Jersey Supreme Court made an unbelievable ruling in State v. Burkert, 231 N.J. 257 (2017). The State Supreme Court held that the trial judge erred by failing to apply enumerated constitutional principles in alleged harassing conduct raised by Defendant Mother. In that case, the New Jersey Supreme Court held that N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4(a), only encompasses modes of communicative harassment that are (1) “invasive of the reicipient’s privacy” or (2) “constitutes threats to safety”. State v. Burkert, 231 N.J. 257, 281 (2017).
Given that the communications between Plaintiff and Defendant are solely about the children, custody/parenting time, and the children’s school activities and grades, Defendant has abused the domestic violence laws in a strategy and tactics to interfere with Plaintiff’s parental rights through an ongoing campaign of false allegations to perpetrate parental alienation. Since Defendant willfully refuses to cooperate with Plaintiff Father, it causes Plaintiff to become frustrated where he attempts to contact Defendant to allow him access to the children.
Plaintiff’s frustration can lead to harsh and crude terms, as happened in this instant case. A parent has the right to be frustrated with another parent when their parenting time/custody is being obstructed or interfered with. Defendant uses this frustration to create false allegations of domestic violence at any chance she can get. It is not an invasion of privacy as Defendant would like the Court to believe. She is the antagonist. There is no categorical ‘harassment exception’ to the First Amendment’s free speech clause. Saxe v. State Coll. Area Sch. Dist., 240 F.3d 200, 204 (3d Cir. 2001)(Alito, J.). Speech “cannot be transformed into criminal conduct merely because it annoys, disturbs, or arouses contempt.” State v. Burkert, 231 N.J. 257, 281 (2017).
Even Plaintiff’s alleged harassing written communications, in the forms of texts or e-mails, “fall within the category of protected speech”. Virgin Islands v. Vanterpool, 767 F.3d 157, 160, 167 (3d Cir. 2014). Criminal harassment conviction was overturned because “expressions remain protected even where content hurts feelings, causes offense, or evokes resentment”. State v. Burkert, 444 N.J. Super. 591, 601 (App. Div. 2016), aff’d 231 N.J. 257 (2017).
Then, in New Jersey, you have the false allegations of child abuse as the second component of the campaign of parental alienation. In the New Jersey Supreme Court precedential case of S.C. v. New Jersey Department of Children and Families, 242 N.J. 201 (2020) it was held that a family court judge has to provide an evidentiary hearing on a "NOT ESTABLISHED" finding by the N.J. Department of Children and Families. The Supreme Court noted that when the confidential information is released to a court in a family law proceeding, that such a process provided the parent “adequate opportunity to be heard on the threshold issue of admissibility and thereafter to cross-examine and offer contrary proofs.”
It established that finding of “NOT ESTABLISHED” cannot be expunged, and could later harm the accused in employment, seeking employment, or personal reputation. It can also be used if other later cases arise. This is of interest to family law practitioners, since the process the court describes is a rare one – usually the records are released to the judge for in camera review and then the court releases the records in its discretion to the parties without any kind of threshold argument as to admissibility or an opportunity to cross-examine. Plaintiff claims (1) he suffered and continues to suffer a deprivation of his due process rights because he was not afforded a hearing on the “not established” finding, and (2) that the Department's "not established" finding was arbitrary and capricious because the record was insufficient to support a finding that his children, specifically his son, were harmed.
The Supreme Court held that with respect to the Department’s standard for making a finding of “not established” as currently written in the N.J. child abuse statutes, N.J.S.A. 9:6-8.21 and N.J.A.C. 3A:10-7.3 (c) and (d), is vague, amorphous, and incapable of any objective calibration. All that is known is that it requires less than a preponderance of the evidence standard and involves “some” evidence. The High Court held that “some” evidence must be understood to be “credible evidence”. Defendant must have the right to be heard and respond, and be given a written statement of reasons in any decision involving “NOT ESTABLISHED”. S.C. v. N.J. Dep’t of Children & Families, 242 N.J. 201, at 387–88, 394–95. See also Department of Children and Families v. B.C., (N.J. App. Div., Docket No. A-2312-20, decided November 2, 2022 (unpublished), at *8, *17),
LOL NO! >97% of rape 'claims' are LIES... the 2% are the real rapes! The mainstream uses the truth in reverse! By Saul Alinsky's playbook rules for radicals/ "Use the truth in reverse" The 2% are the real rapes >97% are LIES! 60% in the military alone by the accuser's own admission.
Your discussion after 36:00 about the larger corruption of prosecutors and the judiciary is important and a potential entry to gain a larger audience for all this. (The plea bargain system that Mr Owens mentions is, just by itself, increasingly recognized as a system of extortion.) The Trump Administration has been silent about judicial reform, despite the lawfare operations against Trump himself and his officials and despite the judiciary now trying to thwart his reforms. (His first administration was also silent.) We need to call attention to this omission by Trump. Some literature on judicial corruption in America, is cited in all my book, most recently in Who Lost America?, chapter 3 (https://www.stephenbaskerville.com/copy-2-of-why-did-it-happen).
BINGO! Trump is a male feminist I'm sorry to say. The 1rst time I voted for Trump is because he called Megan Kelly out for being on the rag. The 2nd time I voted for Trump is because he called Megan Kelly out for being on the rag. The 3rd time I voted for Trump is because he called Megan Kelly out for being on the rag. I'm not voting for him the next time LOL
God bless Arvis Owens! Another class act and stellar guest. Long overdue! SPOILER ALERT:
From an Airforce study and the subject of a 1990's documentary (discovery channel or TLC) ... Sam Donaldson was told by a military official that >60% of rape 'claims' in the military are LIES based only on the accuser's own admission! This study only counted an accusation as false if the accuser admitted she lied! This doesn't count false accusations that weren't admitted to. Consider that military w0e-MEN are between 14% to 16% of the military. 60% of military w0e-MEN'S rape 'claims' are LIES... by their own admission! So... what does the math say? 60% of rape claims are LIES by a 14 to 16% minority do the math. I'm not good at math but if 60% of rape claims are FALSE and they're emanating from a 14% to 16% minority of w0e-MEN making these claims...would I be right to assume 60% of military w0e-MEN LIE about rape? Victoria Toensing said to Sam Donaldson: "That doesn't sound right" "I don't believe that" "There's something wrong with the study" If I remember I think they cucked to her! Also...
International defense lawyer John Davis shows a graph where he proves that >97% of rape claims are LIES. The 2% are the real rapes. The mainstream Stats. are based on the inversion of the truth as in Saul Alinsky's 'RULES FOR RADICALS' Rule 101: 'use the truth in reverse' Please check my notes for this graph.
The true rape statistics! John Davis graph shows exactly how it breaks down.
Like most of the mainstream propaganda in a Matriarchal society you can see a pattern of reverse logic and the inversion of the true facts the reverse of which become the Google checks and fact checks which are exactly opposite of the true numbers. Right out of Saul Alinksy's rules for radicals. If you look at the John Davis graph you will see that the mainstream stats. are the inverse of the truth! The 2% are the real rapes. The 97% are lies.
btw, NO PUSSY PASS for prosecutors & military officials who say: "we didn't want to do this" Being more afraid for your career than your fellow MAN... I say No excuse.
Keith: Your list to eliminate the FALSE ALLEGATIONS INDUSTRY and family courts, should start with the elimination of NO-FAULT DIVORCE. Eliminating NO-FAULT divorce will end the "gravy train grift" for lawyers and other hangers-on. Ever since No-Fault divorce came into being, the family has been devastated by special interest groups looking to make obscene amounts of money. Lawyers, mental health experts, child custody experts, child support caseworkers, etc., are profiting off of a racketeering scam where they use bribery, extortion, coercion, forced labor (violating 18 USC §1589), unconstitutional imprisonment for debt in civil matters, unconstitutional arrests in family court civil matters without 4th Amendment probable cause; probable cause can only exist in criminal matters; can never exist in civil matters).
Simultaneously family courts and their "hangers on" obtain obscene amounts of Federal funding (BILLIONS OF DOLLARS OF TAXPAYERS' MONIES BEING WASTED!!!!) for child support enforcement (Title IV-D business and racketeering scam, 42 USC §§651-669, specifically §658a [called the "Federal Child Support Enforcement Incentive to the States"], and §658f (allowing federal funding to go to the states with no strings attached; where states use the money to balance state employee pensions which includes judges, law enforcement, politicians, child support employees, etc.), Title IV-E foster care (stealing children under false allegations of child abuse/child sex abuse), and Title IV-A through C for the rest of it. Title IV is part of the Social Security Administrative System under 42 U.S.C. §402 et al.