I'm curious if it may be beneficial to shift the focus to male nature - just long enough to understand the details behind our genetic disposition to provide and protect - and deeper than that - to have purpose.
A common theme I hear and heard in this talk - is that marriage and a family is the pinnacle of male purpose and accomplishment.
I believe this perspective needs to shift away from marriage - which is just another way of say women are mens sole priority and purpose in life - and to put the focus on Fatherhood
additional strategic principles need to be side by side Fatherhood
1. Female nature must be understood as mildly toxic and inherently destructive and therefore managed like you're stock piling vials of Ebola
Without this knowledge, you are literally helping women manipulate and use you. There is no grey area here.
2. Male purpose in work needs to be sought out and prioritized first and solely in a young man's life
This I believe is the cornerstone for the principles of Fatherhood and female management
As you've said Paul - male nature has been hijacked by female in group bias. Until men stop rephrasing there worship and deference of women in order to justify a "manly purpose" and see women for the helpers / liabilities they are - the wave of destruction across western society will continue ( god help the UK)
Thank you, Paul, for providing a sense of direction, a sense of coherence and a sense of constructive purpose for young MEN.
I'll give a participation trophy to Baskerville for trying.
One MAJOR disagreement with Stephen Baskerville and where (I saw you take a breath)
41:35 >
And the reason I'm giving him a THUMBS DOWN here: >His trad con notion that:
A FATHER has no rights to his children if he sinned or wasn't married to the wo-MAN!
That sounds like Dennis Prager! WHY should a mother who did the 'same deed' have more rights to a child than the FATHER? Baskerville sounds like the welfare state here!
If they BOTH sinned, they should BOTH SHARE equal responsibility and custodial rights. Why should the FATHER be a scapegoat for the mother who committed the SAME SIN?
I'm afraid Baskerville is part of the Matrix and a victim of the same fear & dogma he speaks of.
I do not necessarily say that unmarried fathers deserve no parental rights. We were discussing cases where an interloper produces a child with another man's wife, in which case I think the traditional Common Law principle applies: the husband has the right of first refusal over the child. In the much more numerous circumstances of today, where millions of children have unmarried parents and need their fathers, then I agree that equal joint custody or "shared parenting" is appropriate. This is not ideal however and should not be seen as a permanent solution. Men and fathers must be champions of true, unadulterated marriage, because when properly constituted that is the only institution that truly creates fatherhood and guarantees paternal rights, for reasons discussed in the interview and in my book. Thank you for the opportunity to clarify this.
Ok, thanks for clarifying. An Adulterous wo-MAN who gets pregnant with her lover is IMOP even MORE guilty and should have to SHARE the responsibility. Thank you for letting me clarify my position as well.
Holiness, accountability, and real revival/reformation is needed. i see no other way forward. In scripture we see examples of men like Nehemiah and Ezra who show us a way forward when it looks like everything is lost. They grieved, fasted, prayed, and obtained God's help. We need extraordinary men for these extraordinary times. No one else is coming to save us. We must become the men God can trust and use.
The child support laws are a form of Bolshevism, I do believe young MEN should be connecting and reconnecting with God, apart from institutionalized religion. We should also be VERY discreet in our choice of wo-MEN.
I disagree with the assertion that the welfare state was the beginning. It was not the CIA that started it either. No, it was the father of the CIA, the OSS, created in WWII that took the spirit of global empire and gave us our modern world.
The OSS created a conglomerate of intelligence agencies from all the WWII Allie’s, and declared the Cold War on the USSR which refused to join.
The US coupe was carried out on JFK, and confirmed with his brother.
By this point we are watching a movie when it comes to politics , just pay your taxes and be sure to vote citizen.
I'm curious if it may be beneficial to shift the focus to male nature - just long enough to understand the details behind our genetic disposition to provide and protect - and deeper than that - to have purpose.
A common theme I hear and heard in this talk - is that marriage and a family is the pinnacle of male purpose and accomplishment.
I believe this perspective needs to shift away from marriage - which is just another way of say women are mens sole priority and purpose in life - and to put the focus on Fatherhood
additional strategic principles need to be side by side Fatherhood
1. Female nature must be understood as mildly toxic and inherently destructive and therefore managed like you're stock piling vials of Ebola
Without this knowledge, you are literally helping women manipulate and use you. There is no grey area here.
2. Male purpose in work needs to be sought out and prioritized first and solely in a young man's life
This I believe is the cornerstone for the principles of Fatherhood and female management
As you've said Paul - male nature has been hijacked by female in group bias. Until men stop rephrasing there worship and deference of women in order to justify a "manly purpose" and see women for the helpers / liabilities they are - the wave of destruction across western society will continue ( god help the UK)
Bingo!
Brilliant!
Thank you, Paul, for providing a sense of direction, a sense of coherence and a sense of constructive purpose for young MEN.
I'll give a participation trophy to Baskerville for trying.
One MAJOR disagreement with Stephen Baskerville and where (I saw you take a breath)
41:35 >
And the reason I'm giving him a THUMBS DOWN here: >His trad con notion that:
A FATHER has no rights to his children if he sinned or wasn't married to the wo-MAN!
That sounds like Dennis Prager! WHY should a mother who did the 'same deed' have more rights to a child than the FATHER? Baskerville sounds like the welfare state here!
If they BOTH sinned, they should BOTH SHARE equal responsibility and custodial rights. Why should the FATHER be a scapegoat for the mother who committed the SAME SIN?
I'm afraid Baskerville is part of the Matrix and a victim of the same fear & dogma he speaks of.
I do not necessarily say that unmarried fathers deserve no parental rights. We were discussing cases where an interloper produces a child with another man's wife, in which case I think the traditional Common Law principle applies: the husband has the right of first refusal over the child. In the much more numerous circumstances of today, where millions of children have unmarried parents and need their fathers, then I agree that equal joint custody or "shared parenting" is appropriate. This is not ideal however and should not be seen as a permanent solution. Men and fathers must be champions of true, unadulterated marriage, because when properly constituted that is the only institution that truly creates fatherhood and guarantees paternal rights, for reasons discussed in the interview and in my book. Thank you for the opportunity to clarify this.
Ok, thanks for clarifying. An Adulterous wo-MAN who gets pregnant with her lover is IMOP even MORE guilty and should have to SHARE the responsibility. Thank you for letting me clarify my position as well.
Holiness, accountability, and real revival/reformation is needed. i see no other way forward. In scripture we see examples of men like Nehemiah and Ezra who show us a way forward when it looks like everything is lost. They grieved, fasted, prayed, and obtained God's help. We need extraordinary men for these extraordinary times. No one else is coming to save us. We must become the men God can trust and use.
Very interesting guest, I’m going to read his books. Paul great interview, thank you.
Oh my God Paul, that had to have been the worst guest ever. His solutions are crap. The solution is destroy the wealth redistribution centers
The child support laws are a form of Bolshevism, I do believe young MEN should be connecting and reconnecting with God, apart from institutionalized religion. We should also be VERY discreet in our choice of wo-MEN.
I disagree with the assertion that the welfare state was the beginning. It was not the CIA that started it either. No, it was the father of the CIA, the OSS, created in WWII that took the spirit of global empire and gave us our modern world.
The OSS created a conglomerate of intelligence agencies from all the WWII Allie’s, and declared the Cold War on the USSR which refused to join.
The US coupe was carried out on JFK, and confirmed with his brother.
By this point we are watching a movie when it comes to politics , just pay your taxes and be sure to vote citizen.